Every once
in a while we like to make sure we’re on the right
track. One of the ways we do this is with a reader
survey that asks readers specific questions about
themselves and us. The knowledge we gain helps us
concentrate on publishing the high-quality editorial
you like as well as finding advertisers with products
you appreciate.
So what did we learn this time? Well, most of you are in your
peak professional years. You tend to prefer working
in companies with less than 100 employees. You’re
all overeducated and make a lot of money. Some of
you have really weird ideas. But, most of all, you
like Circuit Cellar. So, I guess that means
I still have a job.
Seriously, the survey reinforced my belief that Circuit
Cellar’s direction should always be evolutionary
rather than static. Occasionally, I’m criticized for
making Circuit Cellar too “high-level.” We
were all beginners at one time, but now we are professionals.
As a magazine, Circuit Cellar can either choose
to have an editorial level that readers pass through
on their career climb or have an editorial focus that
tracks evolving technology and stays with readers
at the professional level. Overwhelmingly, readers
concur with our direction, but they also want us to
know that part of that evolution now includes an interest
in articles and projects dealing with timely environmental
issues like solar panel controllers, fuel/consumption
monitors and gauges, and power-saving systems.
The survey is also intended to determine which products should
be advertised based on a reader’s professional activities
and which components, MCUs, software tools, or soft
cores they intend to purchase in the future. The conclusion,
from a marketing perspective, is that programmable
logic is an inexorably growing trend despite challenges
from overly complex/pricey tools. And, the budget-priced
“deeply embedded” programmable logic market is growing
thanks to Moore’s law and the emergence of very capable
flash-based parts from some key suppliers.
Finally, contests are still a hot draw, and I’m only encouraged
more with reader comments like these:
Circuit Cellar-managed contests are an added bonus to the
subscription. These contests are a great way to learn
about new tools and the technologies that they represent.
Reviewing completed contest entries can spark new
design ideas. Great work!
A nice opportunity to develop new applications that you've
been thinking about but never came to realize. The
possibility it might be published even makes you want
to put that little vital extra effort into it.
Circuit Cellar readers love participating in our design
contests and poring over all the unique embedded systems
design projects they provide. Why is this so significant?
Consider that our most recently concluded design contest
was centered on using higher-functioning ARM MCUs.
Not only did we receive an exceptional amount of interest
in this contest up front, but our readership survey
indicates that the expanded web presentation of these
ARM contest projects is perhaps one of the most popular
to date among our readers. According to the survey,
readers put ARM among their top four selections when
it came to a wish list of sponsors for the next Circuit
Cellar design contest. This is consistent with
our conclusion that our readership isn’t shying away
from more complex, higher-functioning MCU architectures.
They’re following the evolution in the industry and
embracing it. The survey reveals that our readers
are still strongly considerate of cost-effective,
8-bit design solutions (65%), but the number of potential
ARM users among them will almost double in the immediate
future to more than 30% (the highest of any CPU we
had listed in the “intend to use in a future design”
category).
This documented interest in more complex processors and MCUs
corroborates the fact that Circuit Cellar’s
audience is truly comprised of hands-on design engineers
and serious electronic devotees. They are actively
engaged in obtaining the precise knowledge and experience
necessary to satisfy the most difficult on-the-job
design challenges—whether they involve souped-up 8-bit,
practical 16-bit, vigorous ARM, or refined soft-core/FPGA.
Stay tuned for more.
