circuitcellar.com
Magazine Support   Digital Library   Products & Services   Suppliers Directory 
 
 





 

Issue 109, August 1999
Using System-on Chip Design with Virtual components


Forms of VC

VCs are commonly divided into three categories—hard, soft, and firm. A hard VC or hard macro is a design that is locked to a particular silicon technology. Such macros are fully placed and routed and are available in a fixed size and format.

They can be easily dropped into the floorplan for a chip in the same target technology, because the silicon technology is known, and they usually have predictable timing. However, they can’t easily be mapped to another silicon vendor (e.g., a second source) or even to a different technology from the same vendor. The VC user also has little or no choice in terms of feature set modification or customization.

Hard macros are most often provided by ASIC and FPGA vendors as part of their library. Such macros are a natural extension to the basic cell library used to implement the VC user’s design. Because the silicon vendor sells chips, there’s no incentive to provide a VC in a more portable form that makes it easier for the customer to switch to another supplier.

Some IP vendors, especially those supplying microprocessor and DSP designs, also provide a VC in hard form. This option shows that the key elements of processors, especially data paths for arithmetic computation, are often designed at the transistor level for maximum performance.

Some processors, as well as many other kinds of VC products, are available from IP vendors in soft (or synthesizable) form. A VC described in Verilog RTL or VHDL code gives the user maximum flexibility. It can be mapped to virtually any target ASIC or FPGA technology using commercial logic synthesis tools.

The user may also be able to control the VC feature set, for example, by setting variables in the code or by running a utility that modifies the code under user control. Of course, because the user licenses the actual Verilog or VHDL source code, it can always be modified directly.

One issue with a synthesizable VC is that the precise timing is not known until the VC is mapped to a target technology. Accordingly, soft VC suppliers must synthesize to a range of representative target libraries and ensure that timing is satisfied.

The supplier may also have to supply guidelines to assist the user in laying out the chip containing the VC so that the postroute timing is still correct. Such guidelines may include recommendations for target technology, pin assignments for external I/O, floorplanning for key modules, and routing of critical paths.

The definition of a firm VC varies widely. The term is used most commonly to refer to a soft VC accompanied by an example layout-level implementation, although some people refer to a VC as firm whenever it comes with layout guidelines. The term also refers to a netlist-level VC that has been mapped by synthesis to a target technology but is not yet placed and routed.

It is possible, although difficult, to make customizations to a VC in netlist form. Synthesis tools can also provide some degree of portability to new technologies, but the range of optimizations available when synthesizing from the netlist level is more limited than from Verilog or VHDL.