Two
key problems must be solved in order to electronically
score a bull’s performance. First, you must monitor
the bull’s motions. Then you have to evaluate the
motions and assign a score. You can solve the first
problem by mounting the Buckymeter data collection
system on the back of the bull (see Figure 1).
|

(Click
here to enlarge)
|
Figure
1—The Buckymeter provides a data collection
platform to solve the first problem in automated
rodeo bull scoring.
|
In
the not so distant past, precision motion sensing
was the purview of the military and commercial aviation
companies. Picture an inertial navigation system that
leads a pilot to his destination half a world away.
The more recent explosion in sensing technology for
automotive applications (e.g., air bags and stability
systems) has led to the development of microelectromechanical
systems (MEMS) sensors. These silicon sensors provide
sensing technology that rivals the old navigation
system in a miniature affordable package.
I
used the same sort of technology in the Buckymeter.
I simply connected MEMS sensors to a Philips Semiconductors
LPC2138 microcontroller. My prototype is based on
the Keil MCB2130 evaluation board (see Photo 2). Flash
memory chips provide semi-permanent storage of bull
ride data. I used soldered and internal memory chips
to reduce the overall size of the Buckymeter. I don’t
have to worry about losing the chips when they’re
subjected to strong jarring forces during a bull ride.
|

(Click
here to enlarge)
|
Photo
2—The Buckymeter prototype is built around a Keil
MCB2130 evaluation board. The system features
a Philips LPC2138 microcontroller. |
I
have wireless access to the data in the Buckymeter.
For the prototype, I used IrDA to a Palm Pilot. Depending
on your cost and size requirements, RF wireless solutions
could replace the infrared link.
To
analyze a bull’s performance, you need a good data
collection system. You must collect initial sets of
data to determine the important parameters and their
limits. After you collect data, you must compare the
bull’s motions against a known pattern. In order to
define known patterns, you must record arbitrary performances.
A trained observer can assign scores to various components.
The scoring formula then can be applied to future
performances to produce a quantitative value for the
bull’s performance. Using these methods with existing
electronic components and common computing techniques
can produce a novel approach to the scoring of PBR
bulls.