circuitcellar.com
Magazine Support   Digital Library   Products & Services   Suppliers Directory 
 
 





 

Issue 132 July 2001
Inductive Sensors


by George Novacek

Start LVDT RevisitedThe WorksElectrical Interfaces Mechanical InterfacesThe FutureSources & PDF

THE WORKS

The CSEM sensor, shown in Figure 1, is deceptively simple. Packaged on a small PCB, the sensor module is merely 0.35² × 1.18² (9 mm × 30 mm) and weighs approximately 0.7 grams (0.025 oz). The sensor, which is encapsulated for protection, consists of two individual silicon chips on a single carrier (see Photos 1 and 2).

2107027f1.gif (7467 bytes)
Figure 1—The CSEM sensor diagram is simple. An oscillator drives the excitation coil while the position signal is picked up and decoded by four series-parallel sensor coils.

One chip holds the micro-machined coil assembly with five coils and the other holds the interface electronics. An AC current excites the large octagonal coil. The excitation frequency isn’t externally adjustable and, therefore, isn’t specified. Judging by the overall operation of the sensor, I estimate it to be in the 200- to 500-kHz range. Its purpose is to generate a magnetic field, which is amplitude-modulated by the movement of a structured metallic target, typically a gear or slot. Four sensing coils are connected in differential pairs to pick up the modulated field and feed the resulting signal to a set of amplifiers and amplitude demodulators in the second chip.

Because of the use of differential signal pickup and processing, the sensor is nearly independent of temperature and target distance shifts. The amplitude demodulators, followed by low-pass filters to attenuate the excitation frequency remaining in the signal, produce sine and cosine outputs representing the target’s teeth movement. The sinusoidal signals are squared in the following voltage comparators to generate two trains of pulses; the pulses are 90° phase shifted because of the positioning of the pickup coils. Their duty cycle is affected by the geometry of the target teeth, but is usually kept to 50% by the teeth design. Although the sensor does not achieve the admirable resolution and precision of its variable differential transformer cousin, it consistently delivers a respectable 12 bits, adequate in most applications.