circuitcellar.com
Magazine Support   Digital Library   Products & Services   Suppliers Directory 
 
 





 

June 2004, Issue 167

Wireless Monitoring System


by Alberto Ricci Bitti

The block diagrams here show how most of the building blocks have moved from external hardware to internal software modules. The transmitter’s block diagram counts only three blocks outside the chip, as opposed to six internal function blocks supported by the MCU through a combination of software and on-chip peripherals (see Figure 2). The parts outside the microcontroller are the sensor mechanism and reed relay, two keys for setting up the trap ID and arming the trap, and a 433-MHz low-power transmitter with a rod antenna. The power comes from a couple of button batteries.

(Click here to enlarge)

Figure 2—As you study the transmitter and receiver block diagrams, keep in mind that the microcontrollers contain most of the functions required by the system. This keeps the number of external parts to a minimum. The functions listed in the MCU boxes are implemented with a mixture of software and on-chip peripherals.

Inside the microcontroller, software modules implement a digital generator for encoding data to be transmitted, a scheduler for cyclic “keep alive” transmissions, storage of user-programmable nonvolatile ID data, a detector for the battery charge state, a manager for a simple mechanism to prevent overlapping transmissions, and a module for administration of the low-power modes.

The monitoring station includes a 433-MHz receiver module and its antenna, a relay stage for driving an external alarm or phone dialer, a 2 × 16 LCD module, and a five-button keyboard. I powered the unit with a wall-cube mains adapter through a linear regulator stage. As for the transmitter, many of the functional blocks are implemented by the MCU that’s in charge of decoding the receiver output and discriminating errors that result from bad reception, interference, or the simultaneous transmission of two or more mousetraps.

The MCU also stores trap information. It registers trap IDs in (internal) nonvolatile memory and programmatically updates trap status records in RAM. The user interface block consists of a trap data browser and a configuration mode for learning trap IDs. A monitor station can handle up to 20 transmitters—although a transmitter ID can range among 128 different IDs—to allow more than one monitor to operate on the same or overlapping areas.

 

MOUSE SENSOR

The first problem I had to solve was how to sense the presence of mice. I discarded electronics-only methods (e.g., photocells and capacitive sensing) one after another. Some were too sensitive to dirt, expensive, and difficult to clean; others were too accessible to munching rodents and consumed too much power. In this context, drawing a continuous 5 µA (equivalent to a 1-MW resistor at 5 V) represents significant power!

I was about to give up, when I saw a program on the National Geographic Channel showing the natural curiosity and vitality of mice. Realizing this, I added a little balance to the trap transmitter (see Photo 1). Sooner or later, an unwary mouse—frantically searching the trap for an escape route—will reach the balance. The balance freely pivots on the transmitter’s aerial. A small magnet glued on one side counterweights it. I placed a reed-relay inside the sensor body to detect magnet movements and to trigger in turn the eight-pin processor. Bingo! It’s like having the mouse switch on the transmitter for you!

TRANSMITTER CIRCUIT

The transmitter’s schematic diagram accounts for few parts other than the eight-pin processor (see Figure 3). The more that’s inside the MCU, the less that’s outside. This means not only a leaner bill of materials, but also a small circuit footprint, which is important in this application.

(Click here to enlarge)

Figure 3—The 68HC908QT4 is the heart of the transmitter. It embeds a brownout reset as well as a calibrated oscillator that makes reliable data transmission possible without crystals or resonators. The TX module can be changed in order to suit national regulations and frequencies. The reed switch closes when the mouse moves the sensor balance.

I connected two of the six available I/O pins to push buttons for rearming the trap after trigger detection and to set up the trap ID. Another pin goes to the reed-switch trap trigger. These pins are pulled up internally by the MCU.

A fourth pin drives the 433.92-MHz 2-5000-786 thick film transmitter module. It is compliant with European frequency standards and measures only 25.5 mm × 12.5 mm. The modulation method is on/off keying (OOK) according to the status of the PTA5 pin. When it isn’t transmitting, the module consumes as little as 0.1 µA (more on this later). Check this figure when replacing it with similar parts, because it is vital for battery life.

The only remaining components on the board are a bypass capacitor (CF1) and an electrolytic capacitor (C1) required to lower the output impedance of the two button-type batteries that power the circuit. The circuit is compatible with user-monitor mode in-circuit programming. Connect the ICD interface to pin 7 to watch the code run.

 

MONITORING STATION

Figure 4 reveals the receiver’s internals. I used modules for the LCD and the radio receiver; therefore, the design is noticeably neat and contains few parts. The MC68HC908QY feature set contributes to the circuit’s tidiness. It includes input pull-ups, a steady internal clock oscillator, a brownout detector and reset generation, and flash memory that can be used as a replacement for EEPROM.

(Click here to enlarge)

Figure 4—The receiver has few parts. Pull-ups, an oscillator, reset generation, and EEPROM are all included in the MCU. Connections to LCD pins 15 and 16 (backlight) and R2 can vary to suit your LCD’s specifications. Older LCDs need a contrast control voltage to be set on pin 3. The relay can trigger a phone dialer when a trap triggers.

The 433.92-MHz receiver module takes the signal from the antenna and converts it to a more manageable digital-level pulse train. The receiver can be replaced with similar models to suit national regulations and frequencies.

The microcontroller processes the pulse train in order to distill meaningful signals from the inevitable RF noise background. It then displays the results on the 2 × 16 LCD module, which is connected in 4-bit mode, requiring six out of the 14 available MCU I/O pins. The LCD software driver assumes pins DB0 through DB3 to be at logic level 1 or unconnected. Depending on your LCD module, you may need to apply a contrast control voltage from 0 to 5 V to pin 3. Recent modules usually work well with this pin unconnected.

The keyboard, which consists of five push buttons, takes another five pins, which have their internal pull-ups enabled. I kept ICD pin (port A0) free for in-circuit debugging, as I did for the transmitter, making the board user monitor-debug compatible.

The last available pin is used to drive the relay output, which is realized with a classic transistor stage and a diode for protection against coil’s over-voltages. The circuit is mains powered through a wall adapter supplying 9 to 12 VDC, regulated to 5 V by IC2, a classic 7805 stage. Diode D2 protects the circuit from power reversals. Resistor R2 limits the current for the LED backlight to a safe 40 mA. The backlight works from an unregulated power supply.